[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mechanisms for reviews needed
From: |
Andy Jones |
Subject: |
Re: mechanisms for reviews needed |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Aug 2005 11:02:38 +0100 |
It seems to me that it's all about what the repository actually +is+.
Jacob would like the repository to contain only tested code, ready for
release - if I understand correctly.
Well, that's not really how CVS works. In the past I've used a tags
to show which code is ready for third party review and which versions
have passed that review. That seems to fit much better into CVS'
methodology.
But of course this is all about release control, not version control,
and CVS doesn't do that out of the box - some fiddling is needed.
Pardon me if I am stating the obvious.
Andy.
- Re: mechanisms for reviews needed, Mark D. Baushke, 2005/08/01
- Re: mechanisms for reviews needed, Jacob, 2005/08/01
- Re: mechanisms for reviews needed, Jacob, 2005/08/01
- RE: mechanisms for reviews needed, Arthur Barrett, 2005/08/01
- Re: mechanisms for reviews needed,
Andy Jones <=
- Message not available
- RE: mechanisms for reviews needed, Dave Korn, 2005/08/02
- Message not available
- Re: mechanisms for reviews needed, Jacob, 2005/08/02
- Message not available
- re: mechanisms for reviews needed, Andy Jones, 2005/08/05
Re: mechanisms for reviews needed, Jacob, 2005/08/02