[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Subversion vs CVS
From: |
Jim Hyslop |
Subject: |
Re: Subversion vs CVS |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:36:19 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dale wrote:
> Does this mean I can't have nonrepository files in my working directory?
> When you commit in CVS it ignores files which are not in the repository, so
> you can have experimental files or helper files which are never committed
> but which coexist with the cvs files. Is the behavior not the same for
> subversion?
I could be wrong, but I strongly suspect you will find that asking
questions about SubVersion will get more prompt, and more informed,
answers on a SubVersion mail list.
- --
Jim Hyslop
Dreampossible: Better software. Simply. http://www.dreampossible.ca
Consulting * Mentoring * Training in
C/C++ * OOD * SW Development & Practices * Version Management
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDxyAzLdDyDwyJw+MRAiSXAJ9W++XE0Gbf32UGVPkQ5DxAF58eGwCfeRKm
Lr3ZOns+dPHxKVoDHkdPBAc=
=KBtc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Subversion vs CVS, Dale, 2006/01/12
- Re: Subversion vs CVS,
Jim Hyslop <=
- Message not available