[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP
From: |
Jesse F. Hughes |
Subject: |
Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Jul 2004 21:08:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090017 (Oort Gnus v0.17) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, linux) |
"Richard Watson" <richard@doilywood.org.uk> writes:
> jesse@phiwumbda.org (Jesse F. Hughes) writes:
>
>> I have this vague impression that nnml is more flexible and just
>> plain nicer than nnimap, but I'm not sure how or why.
>
> I'm not really convinced that it is, especially since gnus is one of
> the best imap clients out there.
>
> However if you wanted to retain nnml couldn't you do something clever
> like use nnml on your Maildir via NFS whilst at home? Then you could
> use nnimap while out and about.
But nnml stores each mail in a different file. I thought that IMAP
servers didn't do this, right?
--
Jesse F. Hughes
"[I]t's the damndest thing. There's something wrong with every last
one of you, and I *never* thought that was a possibility. But now I
feel it's the only reasonable conclusion." --JSH sees some sorta light
- To IMAP or not to IMAP, Jesse F. Hughes, 2004/07/14
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/07/15
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Jesse F. Hughes, 2004/07/15
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Richard Watson, 2004/07/16
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP,
Jesse F. Hughes <=
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, David Magda, 2004/07/16
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Kai Grossjohann, 2004/07/17
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Jesse F. Hughes, 2004/07/18
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Marcus Frings, 2004/07/18
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Jesse F. Hughes, 2004/07/18
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Marcus Frings, 2004/07/19
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Jesse F. Hughes, 2004/07/18
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Christopher Browne, 2004/07/18
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Jesse F. Hughes, 2004/07/19
- Re: To IMAP or not to IMAP, Marcus Frings, 2004/07/19