Re: Persistently unread articles

[Jesper Harder]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

> I'd like to mark such articles as "persistently unread" so that as long as
> I dont explicitly remove this special "persistently unread" mark they'll
> keep showing up as unread email.
>
> The `tick' mark is the closest approximation I could find but it's not quite
> what I want: a ticked mark is indeed persistent and will make sure that the
> article appears in the Summary buffer, but ticked articles appear as read,
> not as unread.
>
> Note that I do not want to change the behavior of ticked articles, because
> I already use the tick mark for articles which I want to keep in my
> Summaries but which aren't so important (they should not keep appearing as
> unread).

Not exactly what you're asking for: but you could use scoring to
distinguish between ordinary ticked articles and "important" ticked
articles.

-- 
Jesper Harder                                <http://purl.org/harder/>