Re: Spam quation : procmail v spam.el using spamassassin.

[Hadron Quark]

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> On 19 Jun 2006, hadronquark@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> It is a help : if only to calm me down and think more logically -
>> sometimes it can all be a bit confusing :( Especially with this new
>> default spam process which has replaced spamassassin - it wasnt
>> immediately clear to me wither this spam.el was compatible with
>> spamassassins x-headers etc etc.
>
> It's meant to be general (with SA support among others), and the
> manual tries to explain that.  Did you find the manual section about
> spam.el hard to follow?  If so, it would be helpful if you pointed out
> problems or gave us suggestions so we can improve it.
>
>> Maybe one last answer (which may or may not be in manuals) : I use
>> posting styles to maintain different email folders - is it trivial (before I
>> start wasting time trying) to configure spam.el to move the "mark as NOT
>> spam" to the correct procmail populated maildirs in gnus?
>
> [ ham == NOT spam ]
>
> You can move ham articles automatically out of spam groups.  You need
> to classify that group as a spam group with `G c' and the rest is
> automatic.

Unfortunately, G c brings up a emacs customization page which doesnt
work : it doesnt repsond to any selections. I have no idea why as
everything else I run works fine.

>
> There can be multiple ham destinations per group.  When you exit the
> group, ham messages will be copied or moved to the ham destinations
> (moved to the last one and copied to all the others) and processed
> with the ham processors you've defined (none by default).
>
> You can also define a ham destination of nil (leave in place) or
> 'respool (send back to the split-fancy process).  All of this can be
> customized with `G c'.

Again thanks : if I can get to the bottom of why the Gc page doesnt work
I can proceed. If you have any hints, please let me know.

>
> Ted

--