Re: Does the most recent Mailcrypt support something else than inline PGP?

[Adam Sjøgren]

On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 21:58:57 +0200, Merciadri wrote:

> asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes:

>> Why do you insist on using Mailcrypt?

> Well, one of my fundamental principles is that when something works as
> I want it to, I do not change this `something' for something else. Why
> not using Mailcrypt? It is still maintained, and it suits my needs! :)

a) Your signature separator keeps being broken (despite the lengthy
previous debate), b) You apparantly can't make it do non-inline PGP.

That is how you want it?

This is literally all the configuration I have in Gnus to use epg:

  (setq mm-verify-option 'known
        mm-decrypt-option 'known)
  (setq gnus-buttonized-mime-types '("multipart/signed" "multipart/encrypted"))

... and that stuff is highly optional.


  Best regards,

    Adam

-- 
 "My internal clock is on Tokyo time."                        Adam Sjøgren
                                                         asjo@koldfront.dk

pgp8qxE7do6Ua.pgp
Description: PGP signature