[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reply to self behavior
From: |
Adam Sjøgren |
Subject: |
Re: Reply to self behavior |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:59:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:34:03 +0100, Yuri wrote:
> Still tweaking GNUS in the spare time here.
(It's "Gnus" :-))
> I'm trying to replicate an useful feature of mutt (and some other
> mailers): if you reply to yourself (in the sent mail folder at least),
> mutt would actually create a followup of your message with the original
> recipients instead of actually creating an email for yourself
That is what happens when I follow up (f/F) to my own emails in Gnus. If
I reply (r/R), I send email to myself.
I don't think I have configured anything to get that behaviour; one
related variable is, though:
,----[ C-h v message-dont-reply-to-names RET ]
| message-dont-reply-to-names is a variable defined in `message.el'.
| Its value is
| "\\(asjo\\|adsj\\)@\\(koldfront.dk\\|asjo.org\\)"
| Original value was nil
|
| Documentation:
| *Addresses to prune when doing wide replies.
| This can be a regexp or a list of regexps. Also, a value of nil means
| exclude your own user name only.
| [...]
`----
[...]
> Ideas?
Try F on one of your own emails and see if it doesn't work out-of-the-box?
Best regards,
Adam
--
"Accept the mystery!" Adam Sjøgren
asjo@koldfront.dk
- Reply to self behavior, Yuri D'Elia, 2010/12/22
- Re: Reply to self behavior,
Adam Sjøgren <=
- Re: Reply to self behavior, Yuri D'Elia, 2010/12/22
- Re: Reply to self behavior, Tommy Kelly, 2010/12/22
- Re: Reply to self behavior, Yuri D'Elia, 2010/12/22
- Re: Reply to self behavior, Tommy Kelly, 2010/12/22
- Re: Reply to self behavior, Yuri D'Elia, 2010/12/22
- Message not available
- Re: Reply to self behavior, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/12/22
- Re: Reply to self behavior, Yuri D'Elia, 2010/12/24
- Re: Reply to self behavior, Reiner Steib, 2010/12/23
- Re: Reply to self behavior, Yuri D'Elia, 2010/12/23
- Re: Reply to self behavior, Reiner Steib, 2010/12/23