Re: deferred cancellation of ipc

[Niels Möller]

Marcus Brinkmann <address@hidden> writes:

> However, rather than finding a very complicated hack I would prefer
> to hear what the L4 guys think of it.

Me two. On the one hand, it's probably easy to add to the kernel
(unless there's some easy way of solving the problem already, which we
have missed). And on the other hand, if the problem can be solved by
two dozen lines of user space assembler glue (for each architecture),
why bother adding a new feature to the kernel?

/Niels