[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: capability interface for idl4
|
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
|
Subject: |
Re: capability interface for idl4 |
|
Date: |
Fri, 07 Oct 2005 22:45:02 -0400 |
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 16:23 +0200, Simon Nieuviarts wrote:
> Le Vendredi 7 Octobre 2005 15:32, Jonathan S. Shapiro a écrit :
> > Hopefully, my previous note will lead you to reconsider this.
>
> It does. We do not need to add sources of insecurity.
If we do not add sources of security, how can we emulate Windows? :-)
shap
- Re: problems with hierarchy: L4 pagers, (continued)
- Re: problems with hierarchy: L4 pagers, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/18
- Re: problems with hierarchy: L4 pagers, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/18
- Re: problems with hierarchy: L4 pagers, Espen Skoglund, 2005/10/31
- Re: problems with hierarchy: L4 pagers, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/31
- Re: problems with hierarchy: L4 pagers, Espen Skoglund, 2005/10/31
Re: capability interface for idl4, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/06
Amoeba's approach to capabilities, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/07
Re: Amoeba's approach to capabilities, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/07
Re: Amoeba's approach to capabilities, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/07
Re: Amoeba's approach to capabilities, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/07
Re: Amoeba's approach to capabilities, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/10
Re: Amoeba's approach to capabilities, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/10
[OT] Trusted hardware, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/10
Re: [OT] Trusted hardware, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/10
Re: [OT] Trusted hardware, Udo A. Steinberg, 2005/10/10
Re: [OT] Trusted hardware, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/10