[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The idea of an own L4
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: The idea of an own L4 |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Oct 2005 13:21:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <address@hidden> writes:
> I just hate all this redesign crap, and I'm sure there would be more
> progress and easier progress if things were done incrementally.
That's what has been happening over the last years. There exists an
implementation on top of Mach out of which lessons were learnt. Marcus,
Neal, and other people started to redesign various low-level things on
top of the L4 of the time (look at the `doc' directory in the
repository). Eventually, people started to implement it. Eventually,
it turned out that some of the decisions made were arguably flawed. And
this is where the Hurd on L4 is: trying to fix these flaws.
I consider this to be incremental actually.
Thanks,
Ludovic.
- Re: The idea of an own L4, (continued)
- Re: The idea of an own L4, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/09
- Re: The idea of an own L4, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/09
- Re: The idea of an own L4, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/09
- Re: The idea of an own L4, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/10/09
- Re: The idea of an own L4, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/10
- Re: The idea of an own L4, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/10/10
- Re: The idea of an own L4, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/10
- Re: The idea of an own L4, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/10
- Re: The idea of an own L4, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/10/11
- Re: The idea of an own L4,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: The idea of an own L4, ams, 2005/10/11
- Re: The idea of an own L4, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/11
- Re: The idea of an own L4, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/10/11
Re: The idea of an own L4, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/09
Re: The idea of an own L4, Leonardo Lopes Pereira, 2005/10/10
Re: The idea of an own L4, ness, 2005/10/09