[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Connectivity
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Connectivity |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:18:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
"Jonathan S. Shapiro" <address@hidden> writes:
> You absolutely do *not* need a shared name server for this. The only
> thing a shared name server can accomplish here is to let messages be
> sent between parties who are not authorized.
How do you get two processes to know each other without some sort of a
"name server" -- apart from via the process' initial capability set?
Thanks,
Ludovic.
- Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, (continued)
- Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, Michal Suchanek, 2005/10/13
- Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/13
- Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, Jun Inoue, 2005/10/15
- Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/15
- application shell (was: Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor), olafBuddenhagen, 2005/10/16
- Re: application shell (was: Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor), Jun Inoue, 2005/10/16
- Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, Jun Inoue, 2005/10/16
- Server granularity, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/15
- Re: Server granularity, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/16
- Re: Server granularity, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/17
- Connectivity,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Connectivity, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/17
Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, Bas Wijnen, 2005/10/13
- Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/13
- Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/13
- Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, Bas Wijnen, 2005/10/24
- Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/24
- Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, Bas Wijnen, 2005/10/24
- Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/24
Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/13
Re: setuid vs. EROS constructor, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/13