[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY
From: |
Espen Skoglund |
Subject: |
Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 20:13:56 +0200 |
[Espen Skoglund]
> CapServer must have the right to inspect the permissions of the
> capability it receives from A (i.e., Cap.1..x.1.1). It can use these
> permissions as a mask during the RevCopy operation. (In L4 speak: it
> can use these permissions in the MapItem for the UNMAP operation.)
Slight typo: I meant to say "...in the MapItem for the MAP operation."
eSk
- Re: cap exchange race with map/unmap, (continued)
- Re: cap exchange race with map/unmap, Neal H. Walfield, 2005/10/19
- Re: cap exchange race with map/unmap, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/19
- Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/19
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/19
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/19
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Espen Skoglund, 2005/10/19
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY,
Espen Skoglund <=
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Espen Skoglund, 2005/10/19
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/19
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Espen Skoglund, 2005/10/19
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/19
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Espen Skoglund, 2005/10/19
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/19
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/19
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/20
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/19
- Re: Why COPY != SIMULATED COPY, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/19