[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?

From: Jonathan S. Shapiro
Subject: Re: Fwd: Which 90% of POSIX /is/ good then?
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:20:12 -0400

On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 17:37 +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>    Pids are also broken for another reason: they are public entries in
>    a globally shared, mutable namespace.
> If and only if one considers globally shared mutable namespaces
> broken.  People with a lispish background don't.

Perhaps you have not read Jonathan Ree's work on a lisp-based security
kernel. This was one of the foundational problems that needed to be


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]