[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A comment about changing kernels
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: A comment about changing kernels |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:25:43 -0500 |
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 11:39 +0100, Bernhard Kauer wrote:
> Perhaps I should give an example to make my statement clear:
> Suppose a client A want to transfer a capability to a session to client B.
> Client A can copy or map this capability to B and let B invoke the capbility
> to get a new session from the server S. Or A can call S and say: "give this
> capability to B". Both cases need independently of copy/map 4 IPC's.
You are using your assumptions to reason in a circle. If your protocol
did not presume that sessions were desirable, and that an update to the
badge is therefore necessary, you would conclude that a single COPY from
A to B is sufficient.
shap
- Re: A comment about changing kernels, (continued)
- Re: A comment about changing kernels, Neal H. Walfield, 2005/10/28
- Re: A comment about changing kernels, Bernhard Kauer, 2005/10/29
- Re: A comment about changing kernels, Matthieu Lemerre, 2005/10/29
- Re: A comment about changing kernels, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/10/30
- Re: A comment about changing kernels, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/30
- Re: A comment about changing kernels, Espen Skoglund, 2005/10/31
- Re: A comment about changing kernels, Bernhard Kauer, 2005/10/31
- Re: A comment about changing kernels, Neal H. Walfield, 2005/10/31
- Re: A comment about changing kernels,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: A comment about changing kernels, Bernhard Kauer, 2005/10/31
- Re: A comment about changing kernels, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/31
Re: A comment about changing kernels, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/10/27
A generic IDL for the Hurd (was: A comment about changing kernels), Matthieu Lemerre, 2005/10/31