|
From: | Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: | Re: Persistence Pros and Cons |
Date: | Wed, 02 Nov 2005 17:35:27 +0100 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
[Cc'd `l4-hurd'] "Christopher Nelson" <address@hidden> writes: > Why would state need to be serializable? I meant: in a non-persistent system. The reason for my question is that Jonathan concluded that persistence is mostly "a matter of taste". Passive translators seem to be a counter-example. Thanks, Ludovic.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |