[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A comment about changing kernels
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: A comment about changing kernels |
Date: |
Sat, 05 Nov 2005 12:58:02 -0500 |
Espen:
Thank you for your clarification, and also for so clearly identifying
the real source of your frustration.
I think that perhaps it is better done privately, but I would welcome
any suggestions you might have on how to express myself more effective.
Others are welcome to make suggestions as well.
Part of the problem is that the effect is magnified by email.
Before offering suggestions, I might ask that you first read my comments
on the process of science in a previous note this morning. It is
possible that the root of our difficulty lies in a difference of
principles about how science is to be pursued. These too are (in my
view) subject to revision and improvement.
shap
- Facts vs. Opinions (was: Re: A comment about changing kernels), (continued)
- Facts vs. Opinions (was: Re: A comment about changing kernels), olafBuddenhagen, 2005/11/05
- Re: Facts vs. Opinions, ness, 2005/11/05
- Re: Facts vs. Opinions (was: Re: A comment about changing kernels), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/05
- Re: Facts vs. Opinions (was: Re: A comment about changing kernels), Brian Brunswick, 2005/11/05
- Re: Facts vs. Opinions (was: Re: A comment about changing kernels), Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/05
- real time and self paging, Neal H. Walfield, 2005/11/07
- Re: real time and self paging, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/07
- residency properties and covert channels, Neal H. Walfield, 2005/11/07
- markets and global communication, Neal H. Walfield, 2005/11/07
- Re: markets and global communication, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/07
- Re: A comment about changing kernels,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=