[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: About social balances
From: |
Benno |
Subject: |
Re: About social balances |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Nov 2005 03:57:26 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Mon Nov 07, 2005 at 17:32:23 +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> Australia also has "moral rights", which essentially provides the
> author the right to be recognised as the author, not have anyone
> else identified as the author and to prevent others from
> interfering with the integrity of the work.
>
>This is a very small part of what `moral rights' is about. This is
>more closley related to a proper copyright notice than `moral rights'.
That is all that moral rights, as defined in Australian law is about,
and isn't related to a copyright notice, which simply asserts who
owns the copyright, not who is the author/creator.
Benno
- About social balances, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/11/07
- Re: About social balances, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/07
- Re: About social balances, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/11/07
- Re: About social balances, Benno, 2005/11/07
- Re: About social balances, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/07
- Re: About social balances,
Benno <=
- Re: About social balances, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/07
- Re: About social balances, Benno, 2005/11/07
Re: About social balances, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/07
Re: About social balances, Benno, 2005/11/07
Droits moraux, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/11/07
Re: About social balances, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/07
Re: About social balances, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/07
DRM vs. Privacy, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/07