l4-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Reliability of RPC services


From: Tom Bachmann
Subject: Re: Reliability of RPC services
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 20:46:10 +0200
User-agent: Mail/News 1.5 (X11/20060403)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
>    1. Incoming messages on any valid, unblocked FCRB.
>    2. Especially, incoming idempotent messages.
> 
> So one way to guard against a failing server is to use idempotent timer
> events to implement a "heartbeat" -- in much the way that TCP does.
> 

I don't get it. What do we gain from artificially awaking M? Is the
FCRB->M C invoked still blocked after step 5?
- --
- -ness-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFETRzyvD/ijq9JWhsRAm49AJ9FVCB0N4ALgGPxrz84UdbHaUmx9gCffElW
qplRIbQTo78Gr7/6CSMWosQ=
=htFQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]