l4-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Reliability of RPC services


From: Bas Wijnen
Subject: Re: Reliability of RPC services
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 12:29:44 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403

On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 12:22:23PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
>       The client doesn't _have to be_ notified when its capability is
>       dropped, but it can agree with the kernel that it will be.  Kernel
>       support is needed for this agreement, though.  So the question is: why
>       do you want to prevent such agreements from being made?

s/agree with the kernel/agree with the server/

Sorry about that,
Bas

-- 
I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org).
If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader.
Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text
   in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word.
Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either.
For more information, see http://129.125.47.90/e-mail.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]