l4-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Linus replies


From: Donnie Jones
Subject: Re: Linus replies
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 14:48:54 -0400 (EDT)

Hello Shap,

Thanks for the article.
From Shap's rebuttal:
"There are no demonstrated examples of highly secure or highly robust unstructured (monolithic) systems in the history of computing."

Maybe I am not understanding the definition of "highly secure" systems, but OpenBSD comes to mind for an exmaple of a highly secure, monolithic system. __
Donnie


On Thu, 11 May 2006, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:

I've just put a rebuttal up on the Coyotos site:

 http://www.coyotos.org/docs/misc/linus-rebuttal.html

On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 22:10 -0400, Donnie Jones wrote:

Could someone refute these statements for me?  Or do you agree with Linus'
that microkernels are actually not easier to maintain?

Very important: this isn't what Linux said. What he said is that
microkernel-based *systems* are not easier to maintain. He wasn't making
a statement about microkernels themselves. The statement about
microkernel-based systems is very obviously wrong, and there is ample
evidence that it is wrong.

shap






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]