[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
GFDL (was: Re: KANETON)
From: |
olafBuddenhagen |
Subject: |
GFDL (was: Re: KANETON) |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Aug 2006 22:41:20 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 08:40:51PM -0400, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> The one thing we will require (which is why there is a question about
> GFDL) is that any modification of the document must not be described
> as Coyotos.
This is actually one of the things GFDL tries to ensure... Do you think
the provisions may not be strong enough?
-antrik-
- KANETON, Guillaume FORTAINE, 2006/08/11
Re: KANETON, Luis Araujo, 2006/08/11