[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[OT] Car hijacking (was Re: To Jonathan [backdoor])
From: |
Pierre THIERRY |
Subject: |
[OT] Car hijacking (was Re: To Jonathan [backdoor]) |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:11:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Scribit Anton Tagunov dies 10/01/2007 hora 02:08:
> Jonathan> What prevents a hijacker to use that procedure?
Note that Jonathan didn't write this sentence.
> A combination of factors:
>
> * he needs to find the hidden button
> * to know the exact procedure
Either it's security by obscurity, known to fail for quite some time, or
it's no protection at all.
> * to break the console so that he would be able to touch
> ignition wires together the needed number of times
> (it's part of the procedure)
If he broke into the car in the first place, breaking the console will
be child's game.
> * to have 10 minutes of time - after he's already broken the console!
10 minutes of patience is a cheap price for a car, IMHO.
> * Also the alarm emits funny sounds as he waits
Nothing prevents the hijacker to wait at a secure distance during this
period. Most persons in the neighborhood will just take a look and go
back to their occupations.
But the illusion of security is always comfortable, and that's a
valuable service that anti-hijacking systems vendors provide to their
customers. In this era of paranoia, that may be a good thing.
Delusionally,
Pierre
--
address@hidden
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature