[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd/L4 active?
|
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
|
Subject: |
Re: Hurd/L4 active? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 15 Apr 2007 09:25:58 -0400 |
I would add to Olaf's list:
When Coyotos (or l4.sec) become available, you could work on a Mach
compatibility layer so that the existing Hurd code can run on the new
microkernel. This would be a great way to test the microkernel!
Unfortunately it is too early to start this quite yet.
--
Jonathan S. Shapiro, Ph.D.
Managing Director
The EROS Group, LLC
- Hurd/L4 active?, Shams, 2007/04/13
- Re: Hurd/L4 active?, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/04/13
- Re: Hurd/L4 active?, Shams, 2007/04/13
- Re: Hurd/L4 active?, Pierre THIERRY, 2007/04/14
- Re: Hurd/L4 active?, Martin Barth, 2007/04/14
- Re: Hurd/L4 active?, Martin Barth, 2007/04/14
- Re: Hurd/L4 active?, Richard Braun, 2007/04/14
- Re: Hurd/L4 active?, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/04/14
- Re: Hurd/L4 active?,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: Hurd/L4 active?, olafBuddenhagen, 2007/04/14