[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hurd status
From: |
Oz |
Subject: |
Re: Hurd status |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Dec 2010 23:29:54 -0600 |
thanks i think i might have learned something new so I'll quit trolling for now.
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 December 2010 19:53:17 Parantapa Bhattacharya wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> >> BTW, we are not trying to create a perfect kernel (well, most of us
>> >> aren't :-) ) -- just something that is superior to current mainstream
>> >> kernels in certain regards.
>>
>> Have these aspects been decided and fixed ?
>
> See the heading of http://hurd.gnu.org → mission statement of the Hurd :)
>
> We have Olaf/Antrik to thank for that!
>
> Best wishes,
> Arne
- Re: Viengoos still active?, (continued)
- Re: Viengoos still active?, Neal H. Walfield, 2010/12/05
- Re: Viengoos still active?, Oz, 2010/12/07
- Hurd status (was: Viengoos still active?), olafBuddenhagen, 2010/12/26
- Re: Hurd status (was: Viengoos still active?), Oz, 2010/12/26
- Re: Hurd status (was: Viengoos still active?), Bjartur Thorlacius, 2010/12/26
- Re: Hurd status (was: Viengoos still active?), William ML Leslie, 2010/12/26
- Re: Hurd status, olafBuddenhagen, 2010/12/28
- Re: Hurd status, Oz, 2010/12/29
- Re: Hurd status, Parantapa Bhattacharya, 2010/12/30
- Re: Hurd status, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2010/12/30
- Re: Hurd status,
Oz <=