[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libcdio-devel] head -n 196 vs head -196 ?
From: |
TheSin |
Subject: |
Re: [Libcdio-devel] head -n 196 vs head -196 ? |
Date: |
Fri, 13 May 2005 07:47:21 -0600 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
same on OSX 10.4
address@hidden [~]$ head -h
head: illegal option -- h
Usage: head [-n lines] [file ...]
- ---
TS
http://southofheaven.org/
Chaos is the beginning and end, try dealing with the rest.
On 13-May-05, at 5:38 AM, R. Bernstein wrote:
Well as is not unusual a bug report comes in just before the weekend
before a release. (Fortunately it came *before* though rather than
after.)
I'll try to check things out on my own as well, but does anyone have
an comments on using:
"head -n 196 config.h" versus "head -196 config.h"?
(And yes, using "head" at all here is a horrible hack that I don't
know how to fix better.)
See: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=13073
What's odd is that I use coreutils-5.2.1 same as the person in the bug
report and don't recall such a message. But also I'm interested in
other non-GNU head's and whether they support either of the option
forms above.
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
Libcdio-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libcdio-devel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFChK/p6wPs8J05MxMRAskZAKCZ/28xCHg4RlC9Bzp/+Uv8gNy+RACeMnSn
+vaewKEMfso5GCTcdmA8tro=
=Eg3O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----