liberty-eiffel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Liberty-eiffel] Bug #44601


From: Mehul Sanghvi
Subject: Re: [Liberty-eiffel] Bug #44601
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 22:16:27 -0400

Yes that did the trick.   I was able to get a new germ which has support for clang on OSX/Darwin/macOS.  

The problem I am running into now is that when I run install.sh  I am not getting a "compile_to_c.new"  generated but the following:

    progress 30 1 $MAXTOOLCOUNT "T1: compile_to_c"
    run ./compile_to_c -verbose -boost -no_gc compile_to_c -o compile_to_c.new

I have tried running the command manually and it is no different from when being run in the script.  

The below are results I see before the command completes:

     Total Number of "inspect" used for Dynamic dispatch: 9129
     Total Number of Merged "when" clauses (cumulated): 5097
     Assignment graph: 659 nodes and 2012 transitions.
     FEATURE_STAMPs total number = 5920
     FEATURE_STAMPs with rename  = 39
     Total time spent in parser: 00:00.705835
     Total time spent getting started: 00:00.174095
     Total time spent specializing one type: 00:14.933290
     Total time spent specializing and checking: 00:11.650085
     Total time spent collecting features: 00:00.695697
     Total time spent inlining dynamic dispatch: 00:01.146237
     Total time spent simplifying: 00:03.118921
     Total time spent adapting features: 00:00.222636
     Total time spent safety checking: 00:00.000058
     Type-system safety check not performed in this mode
     (use the -safety_check flag).
     Done.
     Writing "compile_to_c.id" file.
     Aliased STRINGs: 58923.


The log file does not have anything that indicates any issues.  


Thoughts, suggestions ? 


cheers,

     mehul


On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Raphael Mack <address@hidden> wrote:
Am Montag, den 13.06.2016, 10:11 -0400 schrieb Mehul Sanghvi:
>
> Yes that is true.
>
>
> Let me re-compile that again.  I had run make-germ.sh and it had
> deleted resources/smarteiffel-germ/*.c but nothing that a "git pull"
> can not fix.
>
>
> Any other options that I need to be using when compiling compile_2_c
> and generating the germ with clang support ?

-boost -no_gc

should be sufficient. The interesting question is, whether we need
special handling for clang or whether it is sufficiently compatible to
gcc. - But you'll find out and, as the germ code already compiles it
looks good in my eyes.

Regards,
Rapha





--
Mehul N. Sanghvi
email: address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]