Re: More info on libldtl failure

[Nick Hudson]

On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:19:27 +0000, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:

>  Hi Bob,
>  
>  Hmmm.  I think I can see why this might be... the entire deplib chain
>  is followed and loaded for each lt_dlopen()ed module.  Perhaps I need
>  to cache previous successes and failures to avoid repetition?  Or
>  maybe I just need to provide an option to ignore deplibs (and emulate
>  the old behaviour that served us so well before)?

Gary,

I believe your analysis is correct. This libltdl "feature" is causing a slow
behaviour for my KDE2 packages for NetBSD. I've been playing with the idea
that the deplibs should be ignored as well as they should be "auto" loaded
by the OS

Nick
--
aka address@hidden, address@hidden





_______________________________________________________
 Get 100% private, FREE email for life from Excite UK
 Visit http://inbox.excite.co.uk/