[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
patch for "g++-x.x" named compilers
From: |
Ossama Othman |
Subject: |
patch for "g++-x.x" named compilers |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:51:53 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
Hi,
This is from a Debian user:
--------------------------
When one tells libtool to use g++-3.0 as the compiler, libtool barfs
because it doesn't recognize that as a C/C++ compiler. This makes it
harder for people on an architecture which uses GCC 2.x as the default
compiler (eg i386) to diagnose and debug problems related to GCC 3.x.
Here is a simple possible fix, to /usr/bin/libtool:
< *cc | *++ | gcc* | *-gcc*)
> *cc | *++ | gcc* | *-gcc* | g++*)
--------------------------
I suppose this should now be:
< *cc | *++ | gcc* | *-gcc* | xlc*)
> *cc | *++ | gcc* | *-gcc* | g++* | xlc*)
-Ossama
--
Ossama Othman <address@hidden>
Distributed Object Computing Laboratory, Univ. of California at Irvine
1024D/F7A394A8 - 84ED AA0B 1203 99E4 1068 70E6 5EB7 5E71 F7A3 94A8
- patch for "g++-x.x" named compilers,
Ossama Othman <=
- Re: patch for "g++-x.x" named compilers, Bob Friesenhahn, 2002/10/24
- Re: patch for "g++-x.x" named compilers, Robert Boehne, 2002/10/24
- Re: patch for "g++-x.x" named compilers, Bob Friesenhahn, 2002/10/24
- Re: patch for "g++-x.x" named compilers, Robert Boehne, 2002/10/27
- Re: patch for "g++-x.x" named compilers, Albert Chin, 2002/10/27
- Re: patch for "g++-x.x" named compilers, Bob Friesenhahn, 2002/10/27
- Re: patch for "g++-x.x" named compilers, Robert Boehne, 2002/10/27
- Re: patch for "g++-x.x" named compilers, Robert Boehne, 2002/10/28
- Re: patch for "g++-x.x" named compilers, Bob Friesenhahn, 2002/10/28
- Re: patch for "g++-x.x" named compilers, Bob Friesenhahn, 2002/10/27