[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libtool 1.4.3 vs. UnixWare/OpenUNIX
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: libtool 1.4.3 vs. UnixWare/OpenUNIX |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Mar 2003 15:23:40 -0600 (CST) |
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Christian Cornelssen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
> > configure.ac:31: required file `./config-h.in' not found
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > I have the following patch applied to my own copy
> > [...]
>
> IIRC, the toplevel `configure.ac' patch (declaration of `config.h')
> has been reverted and moved to the libltdl subdirectory, which is why
> the bootstrap patch has been updated accordingly.
Just to clarify, my bootstrap output was just as shown. It is a
straight checkout from libtool CVS.
There is no configure.ac support to cause config-h.in to be created.
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen
- RE: libtool 1.4.3 vs. UnixWare/OpenUNIX, (continued)
- RE: libtool 1.4.3 vs. UnixWare/OpenUNIX, Boehne, Robert, 2003/03/18
- RE: libtool 1.4.3 vs. UnixWare/OpenUNIX, Larry Rosenman, 2003/03/18
- Re: libtool 1.4.3 vs. UnixWare/OpenUNIX, Robert Boehne, 2003/03/18
- Re: libtool 1.4.3 vs. UnixWare/OpenUNIX, Larry Rosenman, 2003/03/25
- Re: libtool 1.4.3 vs. UnixWare/OpenUNIX, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/03/25
- Re: libtool 1.4.3 vs. UnixWare/OpenUNIX, Robert Boehne x238, 2003/03/25
- Re: libtool 1.4.3 vs. UnixWare/OpenUNIX, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/03/25
- Re: libtool 1.4.3 vs. UnixWare/OpenUNIX, Christian Cornelssen, 2003/03/25
- Re: libtool 1.4.3 vs. UnixWare/OpenUNIX,
Bob Friesenhahn <=
- Re: libtool 1.4.3 vs. UnixWare/OpenUNIX, Robert Boehne x238, 2003/03/25
- Re: libtool 1.4.3 vs. UnixWare/OpenUNIX, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/03/27
- Re: libtool 1.4.3 vs. UnixWare/OpenUNIX, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/03/27