RE: [PATCH] change order of -L options when relinking

[Scott James Remnant]

On Sat, 2003-11-01 at 01:55, Scott James Remnant wrote:

> The author of the original inst_prefix patch wasn't aware of this, so he
> joined the two -L arguments together in the "right" order, namely
> "-L/usr/lib -L/tmp/usr/lib" which after the reversal is the wrong order.
> 
no, "-L/tmp/usr/lib -L/usr/lib" would be the "right" order as in
upstream libtool, the patch puts them in the wrong order (which comes
out right),

It's 2am, ok!

Anyway, the patch does the right thing :o)

Scott
-- 
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part