[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FYI: 86-gary-commit-list-posts.patch
|
From: |
Scott James Remnant |
|
Subject: |
Re: FYI: 86-gary-commit-list-posts.patch |
|
Date: |
Thu, 12 Feb 2004 21:32:11 +0000 |
On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 23:52, Gary V.Vaughan wrote:
> What do you think of pulling the maintenance rules out of Makefile.am
> into a non-distributed Makefile.maint?
>
Definitely a good idea, patch mailed separately, okay to apply it?
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- FYI: 86-gary-commit-list-posts.patch, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/02/10
- Re: FYI: 86-gary-commit-list-posts.patch, Albert Chin, 2004/02/10
- Re: FYI: 86-gary-commit-list-posts.patch, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/02/10
- Re: FYI: 86-gary-commit-list-posts.patch, Albert Chin, 2004/02/10
- Re: FYI: 86-gary-commit-list-posts.patch, Scott James Remnant, 2004/02/10
- Re: FYI: 86-gary-commit-list-posts.patch, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/02/11
- Re: FYI: 86-gary-commit-list-posts.patch, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/02/11
- Re: FYI: 86-gary-commit-list-posts.patch, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/02/11
- Re: FYI: 86-gary-commit-list-posts.patch, Peter O'Gorman, 2004/02/11
- Re: FYI: 86-gary-commit-list-posts.patch, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/02/11
- Re: FYI: 86-gary-commit-list-posts.patch,
Scott James Remnant <=
- Re: FYI: 86-gary-commit-list-posts.patch, Scott James Remnant, 2004/02/11