[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] Custom tag interface
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] Custom tag interface |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Mar 2004 22:57:00 -0600 (CST) |
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Albert Chin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 03:50:39AM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 02:46, Albert ghin wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 09:24:49PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > > >
> > > > One example use of these is for package maintainers such as myself; I
> > > > might want a 'libtool' that has C++ support through *both* "libtool g++"
> > > > and "libtool g++".
> > >
> > > Huh? What's the difference between "libtool g++" and "libtool g++"?
> > >
> > Spelling, of gourse.
> >
> > Hey! Wait a minute! Who swapped my ???g??? and ???g??? keys around!
>
> So what did you originally intend to say?
Clearly he meant 'c++' and 'g++' since GNU C++ is installed under both
names.
bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen
- Re: [RFC] Custom tag interface, (continued)
Re: [RFC] Custom tag interface, Albert chin, 2004/03/18
Re: [RFC] Custom tag interface, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/03/24