Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl

[Albert Chin]

On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 11:28:13AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> If POSIX dlopen are indeed thread safe, I think I will use them
> directly, instead of libltdl, without surrounding the calls with
> thread mutexes, and document that my package require POSIX/threadsafe
> dlopen.  To check if the system have POSIX dlopen, I could check for
> the function itself, and that _POSIX_VERSION >= 200112L.

What about systems like HP-UX which don't have dlopen() (or require a
patch to get it)?

-- 
albert chin (address@hidden)