Re: [FYI] Cleanup of linux pass_all

[Peter O'Gorman]

Hi Alexandre,

Congratulations on becoming a gcc FR-V maintainer!

I could revert this patch, but it would not do what you want. As you can see 
it was already pass_all on all linux variants before this patch, it just 
didn't look like it.

I think the pass_all thing is from an eariler patch, I'll look into it after 
work today.

Thanks,
Peter

Alexandre Oliva wrote:


> Please, oh, please revert this patch and add a big comment with select
> portions of what I wrote above (it must be the 10th time I try to
> explain why these changes are wrong, but people seem to forget).
>
> On Aug 12, 2004, "Peter O'Gorman" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> > 2004-08-12  Peter O'Gorman  <address@hidden>
>
>
> >         * libtool.m4 [GNU/linux] (AC_DEPLIBS_CHECK_METHOD): Cleanup,
> >         thanks to Daniel Reed.
>
>
> > Index: libtool.m4
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvsroot/libtool/libtool/Attic/libtool.m4,v
> > retrieving revision 1.314.2.46
> > diff -u -3 -p -u -r1.314.2.46 libtool.m4
> > --- libtool.m4 4 Aug 2004 14:12:05 -0000 1.314.2.46
> > +++ libtool.m4 12 Aug 2004 04:02:30 -0000
> > @@ -2208,15 +2208,6 @@ irix5* | irix6* | nonstopux*)
>
>  
>
> > # This must be Linux ELF.
> > linux*)
> > -  case $host_cpu in
> > -  alpha*|hppa*|i*86|ia64*|m68*|mips*|powerpc*|sparc*|s390*|sh*)
> > -    lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all ;;
> > -  *)
> > -    # glibc up to 2.1.1 does not perform some relocations on ARM
> > -    # this will be overridden with pass_all, but let us keep it just in case
> > -    lt_cv_deplibs_check_method='file_magic ELF [[0-9]][[0-9]]*-bit [[LM]]SB 
> > (shared object|dynamic lib )' ;;
> > -  esac
> > -  lt_cv_file_magic_test_file=`echo /lib/libc.so* /lib/libc-*.so`
> >   lt_cv_deplibs_check_method=pass_all
> >   ;;
>
>  


--
Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com