libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: libtool--release--2.0 test results


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: libtool--release--2.0 test results
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:04:31 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 07:31:32PM CEST:
> hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11: All 87 tests passed (12 tests were not run)
> hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.00: All 87 tests passed (12 tests were not run)
> hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20:  3 of 85 tests failed [[All tagdemo-make]]
> mips-sgi-irix6.5:      4 of 99 tests failed [[quote, *-hardcode && *-relink]]
> 
> Not too bad so far :-)

i686-pc-linux-gnu:       All 99 tests passed
ia64-unknown-linux-gnu:  1 of 99 tests failed [[tagtrace because of 
autoconf-2.13]]
i686-pc-linux-gnu with icc/icpc/ifort and GNU ld:
                         3 of 96 tests failed (12 tests were not run)

The icc failures are mdemo-dryrun and mdemo-make (after non-static
configuration):
icc/icpc/ifort use -version-info internally when calling the linker.
GNU ld does not allow more than one -version-info if one of them has
anonymous symbols.  One workaround for C and Fortran code would be not
to add C++ runtime libraries with -no_cpprt.  I don't know what the
right solution would be.  Is there any similar precendential case?

Furthermore, f77demo-make fails for the non-static configurations with a
./.libs/libmix.so: undefined reference to `MAIN__'
while trying to link cprogram.  I'm not sure how to fix this, not being a
Fortran expert.

Regards,
Ralf




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]