libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: libtool.texi: need_lib_prefix doc


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: libtool.texi: need_lib_prefix doc
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 17:23:31 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 04:41:52PM CET:
> Gary>
> Gary> @defvar need_lib_prefix
> Gary> Whether we can @code{dlopen} modules without a @samp{lib} prefix.
> Gary> Set to @samp{yes} or @samp{no}.  By default, it is @samp{unknown}, which
> Gary> means the same as @samp{yes}, but documents that we are not really sure
> Gary> about it.  @samp{no} means that it is possible to @code{dlopen} a
> Gary> module without the @samp{lib} prefix.
> 
> Ralf> Sure.  Should I check it in?
> 
> If you agree that it is better than what is there currently, then please go
> right ahead :-)

Done.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]