Re: CC can be a program name *with arguments*

[Albert Chin]

On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 03:38:58PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar  2, 2005, "Peter O'Gorman" <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > I am going to stand up again (because I like being shot down) and ask
> > if the "stand alone utility" bit is really necessary.
> 
> I wish it would just go away, or be properly implemented.  I see so
> many people being bitten by this that every now and then I think we
> should just remove it and stop giving people the impression that it's
> expected to work.  Which is not to say that nobody would be able to
> take the libtool script generated during libtool build and install
> that, it's just that I'd rather no longer install it by default.
> 
> Until we get as far as implementing something that enables us to use
> the pre-installed libtool properly, which implies doing configuration
> on-the-fly, recognizing ABI-changing flags and all such tricky stuff,
> and possibly generating config bits in the current directory/.libs or
> so.

I agree!

-- 
albert chin (address@hidden)