[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FYI: compensate compiler warnings and boilerplate (branch-1-5)
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: FYI: compensate compiler warnings and boilerplate (branch-1-5) |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:05:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 07:07:54PM CEST:
> * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:08:06PM CEST:
> > Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> >>> _LT_TAGVAR(lt_simple_*_test_code, $1)="foo;\n"
> >>>
> >>> Which implies:
> >>>
> >>> # _LT_*_BOILERPLATE([TAG])
>
> I don't have any idea how to proceed from here:
I've looked at this again, and, to tell you the truth, I don't believe
my original proposal is making matters much worse, given that I think a
clean fix would require quite a bit of work.
To put it another way: I would like permission to apply my patch as
proposed originally, to branch-2-0 and HEAD. Evolution of
AC_LIBTOOL_LINKER_OPTION rather shows a trend away from encoding
language specifics in there, and I would love to be able to keep it that
way. Also note that the Automake variables we use (ac_compile, for
example) work exactly the same way.
This patch is a predependence for another couple of patches I work on.
> Variable $_lt_linker_boilerplate is used from _LT_LINKER_OPTION, which
> has old name AC_LIBTOOL_LINKER_OPTION. I assume it's published
> interface. How can I adapt it to use TAG?
These two questions (first about published interface implied) have not
been answered.
> Set _lt_linker_boilerplate=_LT_TAGVAR(_lt_linker_boilerplate, $1) in
> _LT_LINKER_BOILERPLATE? This would be ugly as hell again. :(
>
> Similar issue with AC_LIBTOOL_COMPILER_OPTION. I don't think I can
> change these?
For the record: the proposed patch is[1].
Regards,
Ralf
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2005-04/msg00080.html
- Re: FYI: compensate compiler warnings and boilerplate (branch-1-5),
Ralf Wildenhues <=