[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ltdl sillyness

From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: ltdl sillyness
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 14:17:20 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

* Peter O'Gorman wrote on Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 06:52:00AM CEST:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> >Does a simple test expose this on Tru64?  Try something like adding a
> >call to mdemo-exec that tries
> >  ( cd mdemo && ./mdemo )
> >(i.e., without path) and if this exposes it, please commit along with
> >it.  (It doesn't expose it on GNU/Linux.)
> No, if the dlopen() call fails on a file thta exists, it drops through to 
> here. I'll come up with something to test it at the weekend.

Hacky test, exposes on systems where LTDL_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS is defined:

sed 's,foo1,foo2' >
./mdemo ./       # file not found error
./mdemo         # assertion

Testing this worked with faking by defining LTDL_DLOPEN_DEPLIBS in
config.h, on GNU/Linux, as well.  (I don't think you need to do this
in the test, since testing the other issue won't work here.)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]