Re: Ignore hardcode_direct=yes if results in static lib entry

[Ralf Wildenhues]

Hello,

* Albert Chin wrote on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 03:18:09AM CEST:
> The following patch addresses
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2006-04/msg00044.html. I
> added a new variable, hardcode_direct_static, to indicate if
> hardcode_direct=yes would hardcode a static library dependency. This
> impacts HP-UX/PA and AIX.
> 
> Patch against HEAD.

This patch is missing a documentation update (doc/libtool.texi).
I'm not sure whether it should be backported, probably not.

Does the testsuite pass with this?

Cheers,
Ralf

> 2006-05-16  Albert Chin-A-Young  <address@hidden>
> 
>       * libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh, libltdl/m4/libtool.m4
>       (_LT_LINKER_SHLIBS, _LT_LANG_CXX_CONFIG, _LT_LANG_F77_CONFIG,
>       _LT_LANG_FC_CONFIG) [ aix4*, aix5*, hpux10*, hpux11* ]: 
>       Introduce a new variable, hardcode_direct_static, which
>       would ignore hardcode_direct=yes if the result would create a
>       static library dependency. Static library dependencies are
>       immune to $shlibpath_var.