[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PATCH: Use AC_DEFUN instead of m4_defun in libtool.m4
From: |
H.J. Lu |
Subject: |
Re: PATCH: Use AC_DEFUN instead of m4_defun in libtool.m4 |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Jul 2007 23:14:24 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) |
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 12:37:32AM -0500, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 22:09 -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 06:59:52AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > >
> > > >It is fixed in th next libtool. Should I check in my work around
> > > >in gcc and src?
> > >
> > > No, please test their bugfix and see if it works for you (just trying to
> > > minimize the chance that it breaks next time we update).
> >
> > I have no time to test libtool. I will leave it ASIS.
>
> I think you misunderstand, it is fixed in the version of libtool that
> gcc is using, but gcc is missing a file, lt~obsolete.m4.
I don't get it. Shouldn't libtool in gcc require lt~obsolete.m4 so
that it won't be missing in the first place? To me, a missing
lt~obsolete.m4 is a bug in libtool.
H.J.
- Re: PATCH: Use AC_DEFUN instead of m4_defun in libtool.m4, (continued)
- Re: PATCH: Use AC_DEFUN instead of m4_defun in libtool.m4, Peter O'Gorman, 2007/07/01
- Re: PATCH: Use AC_DEFUN instead of m4_defun in libtool.m4, H.J. Lu, 2007/07/01
- Re: PATCH: Use AC_DEFUN instead of m4_defun in libtool.m4, Peter O'Gorman, 2007/07/01
- Re: PATCH: Use AC_DEFUN instead of m4_defun in libtool.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/07/01
- Re: PATCH: Use AC_DEFUN instead of m4_defun in libtool.m4, Bob Friesenhahn, 2007/07/01
- Re: PATCH: Use AC_DEFUN instead of m4_defun in libtool.m4, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/07/01
Re: PATCH: Use AC_DEFUN instead of m4_defun in libtool.m4, H.J. Lu, 2007/07/02
Re: PATCH: Use AC_DEFUN instead of m4_defun in libtool.m4, Paolo Bonzini, 2007/07/02
Re: PATCH: Use AC_DEFUN instead of m4_defun in libtool.m4, H.J. Lu, 2007/07/02
Re: PATCH: Use AC_DEFUN instead of m4_defun in libtool.m4, H.J. Lu, 2007/07/05