libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: rm -f


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: rm -f
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2008 20:38:09 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 06:47:41PM CET:
> Proposed patch below should fix all instances.  Please test, thanks.

The patch does fix this issue, but the low max_cmd_len test still fails
for another reason (failure of test `enforced lib prefix' with or
without low max_cmd_len).  So I've applied it now to HEAD.

Cheers,
Ralf

> 2007-12-22  Ralf Wildenhues  <address@hidden>
> 
>       * libltdl/config/ltmain.m4sh (func_mode_link): When creating
>       reloadable object files, avoid issuing plain `rm -f' without
>       further arguments, even if the line length limit is ridiculously
>       low as in the `Run tests with low max_cmd_len' test.  This
>       failure is exposed on NetBSD.
>       Report by Patrick Welche.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]