[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No need for object file removal before compilation
From: |
Peter O'Gorman |
Subject: |
Re: No need for object file removal before compilation |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Apr 2008 02:06:39 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) |
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
>> OK to apply? I fail to see why it's necessary to remove these files.
>> If they existed from a previous compile, they are outdated, so what.
>> But I may be overlooking something here.
>
> Removing the object file in advance accomplishes several things:
But, if libtool were not sitting there between make and the compiler,
the compiler would not remove the object files. Why should libtool do so?
I would have been inclined to ok this one.
Peter
--
Peter O'Gorman
http://pogma.com
- No need for object file removal before compilation, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/09
- Re: No need for object file removal before compilation, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/04/09
- Re: No need for object file removal before compilation,
Peter O'Gorman <=
- Re: No need for object file removal before compilation, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/04/10
- Re: No need for object file removal before compilation, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/12
- Re: No need for object file removal before compilation, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/12
- Re: No need for object file removal before compilation, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/04/12
- Re: No need for object file removal before compilation, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/04/18