[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support
From: |
Markus Duft |
Subject: |
RE: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:26:10 +0200 |
>
> Hi Ralf,
>
> Ralf Wildenhues skrev:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
<snip>
>
> So, I guess I'm saying that I'd prefer sticking to:
> if test "$GCC" != yes; then
> reload_cmds=false
> fi
>
> Ok to push?
Could this break parity support? I know It's not in the tree yet, but I
still hope, that ralf comes to looking into my patch some day....
>
> > I'm thinking of two problem cases:
> > - could be someone would like to use cccl with GNU binutils ld
I guess neither cccl nor parity will work with GNU ld right now, BUT: M$ own
cc and cc89 scripts (which are used by M$ to build nearly the whole system
with MSVC as backend) use GNU ld, maybe those aren't too important, since
not many people except M$ use it, but still ...
>
> I have wasted quite a bit of time trying to make cccl work. Can someone
> pleasepleaseprettypleasewithsugerontop point me to the *exact* cccl
> script I should use, what environment I should have and how I should
> configure to make it work?
Use parity instead :)
Cheers, Markus
>
> > - could be another non-GCC compiler (we've had reports about
> > those on w32 before, I don't remember whether that was Portland or
> so)
> >
> >
> > FWIW, did you know that 'w32' to me just means "Windows, 32bit"? ;-)
>
> Err, yes, what makes you make that statement? The same goes for me, but
> cygwin is also w32 but most of the time you are best off if you forget
> that when you are using cygwin, and that's one of the reasons the name
> w32 is not all that useful. When I'm aware of what I'm doing I try to
> hold back any use of w32, it's generally too unspecific. Any time I see
> w32, I think: "Ok, what is not included this time?"
>
> > Cheers,
> > Ralf
> >
> > PS: I'm aware of other loose ends in this thread. I'll get to them
> > eventually, hopefully. ;-) Feel free to ping me if I haven't by the
> > end of next (not this) weekend.
>
> I will, thanks in advance!
>
> Cheers,
> Peter
>
- Re: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support, (continued)
- Re: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/08/11
- Re: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/08/13
- Re: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support, Peter Rosin, 2008/08/13
- Re: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support, Peter Rosin, 2008/08/13
- Re: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/08/14
- Re: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support, Peter Rosin, 2008/08/15
- Re: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/08/16
- Re: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support, Peter Rosin, 2008/08/17
- Re: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/08/19
- Re: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support, Peter Rosin, 2008/08/19
- RE: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support,
Markus Duft <=
- Re: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support, Peter Rosin, 2008/08/20
- Re: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support, Peter Rosin, 2008/08/20
- RE: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support, Markus Duft, 2008/08/20
- Re: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/08/21
- Re: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support, Peter Rosin, 2008/08/22
- Re: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/08/22
- Message not available
- Message not available
- RE: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support, Markus Duft, 2008/08/22
- Re: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support, Peter Rosin, 2008/08/22
- RE: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support, Markus Duft, 2008/08/25
- Re: [patch #6448] [MSVC 7/7] Add MSVC Support, Peter Rosin, 2008/08/25