Re: [PATCH] Add --lt-* options to shell wrapper

[Charles Wilson]

Charles Wilson wrote:
> This one, I think is OK for pre-2.2.8 -- what do you guys think?
> OK to push?

In response to review comments over here:
"Re: [PATCH] Enable runtime cwrapper debugging; add tests"
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2009-12/msg00014.html

I've created a followon patch to this one which allows the cwrapper
tests to pass on platforms which don't use the cwrapper but instaed use
the shell wrapper (e.g. linux).

If this follow-on, and the original patch for this thread, are approved,
then I'll squash these two patches into a single commit and update the
log before pushing.

Full test suite in progress on cygwin (but cwrapper test passes, as do a
number of spot-checked tests in the old test suite). Linux results:

Old: All 94 tests passed
New: Only two unexpected results (in particular, the cwrapper test passed)

 21: passing CXX flags through libtool               FAILED (flags.at:24)
100: Run tests with low max_cmd_len                  FAILED
(cmdline_wrap.at:43)

Err.. 21 should have been skipped, because I haven't installed g++ on
the linux box yet. And 100 is just a repeat of 21.

--
Chuck

update-shwrapper.chg
Description: Text document

update-shwrapper.patch
Description: Text Data