Re: [REBASED PATCH 6/9] teach libtool -L= and -R=

[Charles Wilson]

On 7/28/2010 6:25 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 07/22/2010 08:36 PM, Charles Wilson wrote:
> > @@ -5777,11 +5812,13 @@ func_mode_link ()
> > for deplib in $dependency_libs; do
> > newdependency_libs="$deplib $newdependency_libs"
> > if $opt_preserve_dup_deps ; then
> > + func_resolve_sysroot "$deplib"
> > + deplib=$func_resolve_sysroot_result
> > case "$tmp_libs " in
> > *" $deplib "*) func_append specialdeplibs " $deplib" ;;
> > esac
> > + func_append tmp_libs " $deplib"
> > fi
> > - func_append tmp_libs " $deplib"
> > done
> >
> > if test "$link_all_deplibs" != no; then
>
> Any reason why you moved the func_append within the if?

No, that's a mistake.  The rebase was kinda difficult, because since 
last July all the foo="$foo $other" stuff got replaced with func_append. 
So, the before-and-after diffs were a little hard to interpret; I tried 
to be pretty careful, but I'm not surprised that a mistake got thru.

Do you think this might be the reason for the new:041 failure?

--
Chuck