[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFT PATCH v4 0/8] Sysroot series
From: |
Charles Wilson |
Subject: |
Re: [RFT PATCH v4 0/8] Sysroot series |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Aug 2010 14:03:11 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 |
On 8/1/2010 10:47 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> 112: override pic_flag at configure time FAILED (pic_flag.at:48)
>>
>> 112 has been discussed before and should be
>> skipped on non-ELF.
>
> Since I wasn't around, why is this regressing? Is it intermittent?
> Maybe a double-check of the testsuite.dir would be nice.
It's not technically a "regression" since AFAIK there was never a time
when that particular test actually passed on cygwin/mingw. IIRC, it is
a new testsuite addition that was never validated on cygwin/mingw. The
fact that the test failed on cygming just wasn't caught until I reported
it some months ago, in another context.
However, there have always been bigger fish to fry, so nobody has gotten
around to making it skip on non-ELF, or figuring out how to translate
the test into terms that might make sense on PE/COFF.
--
Chuck
- Re: [PATCH] Do not absolutize paths eagerly., (continued)
- [RFT PATCH v4 2/8] add --with-sysroot, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/08/01
- [RFT PATCH v4 1/8] handle sysroot flags, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/08/01
- [RFT PATCH v4 7/8] add sysroot test, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/08/01
- [RFT PATCH v4 8/8] initial version of the NEWS entry, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/08/01
- [RFT PATCH v4 5/8] process postdeps to include sysrooted paths, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/08/01
- Re: [RFT PATCH v4 0/8] Sysroot series, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/01
- Re: [RFT PATCH v4 0/8] Sysroot series,
Charles Wilson <=
- Re: [RFT PATCH v4 0/8] Sysroot series, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/01
- Re: [RFT PATCH v4 0/8] Sysroot series, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/08/02
- Re: [RFT PATCH v4 0/8] Sysroot series, Charles Wilson, 2010/08/02