Re: PATCH: Don't fall back to static libraries if building them was disabled.

[Brooks Moses]

On 07/07/2011 08:37 AM, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:07:17 +0200 Peter Rosin <address@hidden> wrote:
> PR> Den 2011-06-23 14:25 skrev Vadim Zeitlin:
> PR> > Am I the only one to think that this behaviour is singularly
> PR> > unhelpful?
> PR>
> PR> Of course not, others have stated that a patch would be welcome to
> PR> fix --disable-static (and --enable-shared) to error out if it is not
> PR> possible to create a shared library (due to a missing -no-undefined).
>
>   Sorry for the delay, I got distracted by other things but here is finally
> the promised trivial patch (I also cc it to libtool-patches just in case,
> sorry if you get this message twice):

Looks like there's consensus that this at least is an improvement, so I've 
committed it as attached.  (I also amended the warning slightly to make it 
clear what it meant for the build.)

Thanks,
- Brooks

0001-libtool-Don-t-fall-back-to-static-libraries-if-build.patch
Description: Text Data