[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dlopen on Solaris compared with IRIX/Tru64
From: |
Bjoern Fischer |
Subject: |
Re: dlopen on Solaris compared with IRIX/Tru64 |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Dec 2000 21:53:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
> BTW, I posted the same message to comp.unix.solaris and it turns out
> there is a solution. In my code below, I dlopen libz.so and then
> libpng.so. This fails. libpng.so has a hard-coded dependency on
> libz.so.2. So, if I dlopen libz.so.2 and then libpng.so, everything
> works! Now, I don't think libtool embeds enough information in the
> *.la files to figure this out.
This works, but it is a hack. The proper solution is to fix libpng.so.
Early libtool versions have no or bad support for hardcoding RPATHs
into shared objects.
Bjoern
--
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
GCS d--(+) s++: a- C+++(-) UB++++OSI++++$ P+++(-) L---(++) !E W- N+ o>+
K- !w !O !M !V PS++ PE- PGP++ t+++ !5 X++ tv- b+++ D++ G e+ h-- y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
- dlopen on Solaris compared with IRIX/Tru64, Albert Chin-A-Young, 2000/12/20
- Re: dlopen on Solaris compared with IRIX/Tru64, Albert Chin-A-Young, 2000/12/20
- Re: dlopen on Solaris compared with IRIX/Tru64, Bjoern Fischer, 2000/12/20
- Re: dlopen on Solaris compared with IRIX/Tru64, Tom Kacvinsky, 2000/12/20
- Re: dlopen on Solaris compared with IRIX/Tru64, Bjoern Fischer, 2000/12/20
- Re: dlopen on Solaris compared with IRIX/Tru64, Tom Kacvinsky, 2000/12/21