[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Fwd: ltmain.in]
From: |
Michael Matz |
Subject: |
RE: [Fwd: ltmain.in] |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Mar 2002 15:04:39 +0100 (MET) |
Hi,
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
> > current g++ version (not to speak of proprietary compilers)
> > which need that explicit linking. Instead a simple "g++
> > -shared -o libbla.so works". Well, yes, those only having a
> > static libstdc++ are screwed, but so what?
>
> Well that's quite a few of us (cygwin, mingw)!
Hmm, yes. But I'm not even sure, you're screwed at all. Does g++ -shared
the right thing for you? I guess not, as g++ anyway can't produce DLL's
on it's own, or? Doesn't it anyway need a special tool? I.e. does
libtool without the pre-/postdeps work on cygwin, or not?
Ciao,
Michael.